Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 14 de 14
Filter
1.
Pediatr Int ; : e15407, 2022 Nov 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2231223

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Published data on COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) use in children and obstetric patients are limited. We describe a single-center experience of hospitalized patients who received CCP for acute COVID-19. METHODS: A retrospective review of children 0-18-years-old and pregnant patients hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed acute COVID-19 who received CCP from March 1st , 2020 to March 1st , 2021 was performed. Clinical and laboratory data were collected to assess the safety of CCP administration. Antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 were measured in the CCP products and in patients before transfusion and at various time points post-transfusion. Correlation between SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin administered versus the SARS-CoV-2 anti-Spike immunoglobulin response in patient serum was assessed. RESULTS: Twenty-two children and 10 obstetric patients were eligible. Twelve pediatric and 8 obstetric patients had moderate disease and 10 pediatric and 2 obstetric patients had severe disease. Five pediatric patients died. Eighteen of 37 (48.6%) CCP titers that were measured met FDA criteria for high IgG antibody titer. There were no complications with transfusion. High-titer CCP showed a positive correlation with rise in patient total immunoglobulin levels only in obstetric patients but not in pediatric patients. Among pediatric patients, the median serum antibody level increased over time after transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: CCP was administered safely to our patients. Our study suggested that CCP did not interfere with endogenous antibody production. The antibody titer of CCP correlated with post-transfusion response only in obstetric patients. Randomized trials in pediatric and obstetric patients are needed to further understand how to dose CCP and evaluate efficacy.

2.
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc ; 43: 101144, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2086280

ABSTRACT

Background: Coronavirus-2019 (COVID-19) is known to affect the heart and is associated with a pro-inflammatory state. Most studies to date have focused on clinically sick subjects. Here, we report cardiac and proinflammatory biomarkers levels in ambulatory young adults with asymptomatic or mild COVID-19 infection compared to those without infection 4-8 weeks after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2) testing. Methods: 131 asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic subjects were enrolled following testing for SARS-COV-2. Fifty subjects tested negative, and 81 subjects tested positive. Serum samples were collected for measurement of C-reactive protein, ferritin, interleukin-6, NT-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, and cardiac troponin 28-55 days after SARS-COV-2 RT-PCR testing. Results: Biomarker levels trended higher in SARS-COV-2-positive vs negative subjects, but differences in biomarker levels or proportion of subjects with elevated biomarkers were not statistically significant with respect to SARS-COV-2 status. Among individuals with ≥ 1 comorbidity, odds of elevated CRP were greater compared to individuals without any comorbidities (odds ratio [OR] = 2.90); this effect size was increased 1.4-fold among SARS-COV-2-positive subjects (OR = 4.03). Similarly, NT-pro-BNP was associated with CVD, with the strongest association in COVID-positive individuals (OR = 16.9). Conclusions: In a relatively young, healthy adult population, mild COVID-19 infection was associated with mild elevations in cardiac and proinflammatory biomarkers within 4-8 weeks of mild or asymptomatic COVID-19 infection in individuals with preexisting comorbidities, but not among individuals without comorbidities. For the general population of young adults, we did not find evidence of elevation of cardiac or proinflammatory biomarkers 4-8 weeks after COVID-19 infection.Clinical Perspective: This is a characterization of cardiac and proinflammatory biomarkers in ambulatory subjects following asymptomatic or mild COVID-19 infection. Young, ambulatory individuals did not have cardiac and proinflammatory biomarker elevation 4-8 weeks after mild COVID-19 infection. However, COVID-19 infection was associated with biomarker elevations in select individuals with comorbidities.Clinical study number: H-47423.

3.
Diabetes ; 71, 2022.
Article in English | ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-1952107

ABSTRACT

Introduction: T1D management, age-related stressors and the COVID-pandemic may impair sleep for young adults with T1D. Disparities in A1c and exposure to life stressors may contribute to poorer sleep among people from minoritized racial/ethnic groups. We aimed to describe sleep, correlations with A1c, and sleep patterns across racial/ethnic groups in young adults with T1D during the pandemic. Methods: Young adults with T1D (n=37, M age=20.2±1.6 yrs, 57% female, M A1c=8.9±2.4%) completed an adapted Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and 1 sleep-related question from a COVID-questionnaire at baseline of a behavioral trial. Results Overall, 41% endorsed worse sleep during the pandemic, which was correlated with poorer sleep quality (r=-.69, p<.001) and shorter sleep duration (r=-.35, p=.04) . Higher A1c was linked with less frequent T1D management-related sleep disruptions (r=-.44, p=.007) . There were no significant differences in sleep variables among racial/ethnic groups. See Table for sleep descriptions for each racial/ethnic group. Conclusions: Young adults with T1D experienced disrupted sleep, worsened by the pandemic. Clinicians should counsel patients about optimizing sleep and overnight diabetes management, especially those with higher A1c. While small sizes reduced power to detect group differences, initial patterns suggest a need for future research examining disparities in sleep for young adults with T1D.

4.
Diabetes ; 71, 2022.
Article in English | ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-1923925

ABSTRACT

Objective: Vaccination can help prevent COVID-infection and serious health complications. This is particularly important for people with diabetes, who may be at higher risk for COVID-complications. While unvaccinated adults tend to be younger in general, there are no data on vaccine attitudes or uptake in young adults with T1D. We explored vaccine uptake in young adults with T1D across demographic and clinical factors and identified common reasons for not getting the vaccine. Methods: At baseline of an ongoing behavioral intervention trial (Feb-Dec 2021) , 35 young adults with T1D (M age= 20.2±1.6, 57% female, 54% non-Hispanic White, 23% Hispanic, 9% Black, 14% other/multiple, M A1c=8.9±2.4%) reported on vaccination status. Unvaccinated participants provided open-text comments on their reasons. Results: Overall, 69% of participants were vaccinated (2 doses) . Unvaccinated participants had higher median A1c than vaccinated participants (9.7% vs. 7.6%, p=0.03) ;every 1.0% increase in A1c was associated with 22.2% decreased odds of being vaccinated. There were no differences in vaccine uptake by age, gender, race/ethnicity, education, employment, pump or CGM use, or health insurance. The unvaccinated participants reported reasons including: distrust of the vaccine research/effectiveness (4) , uncertainty about health impacts (including T1D) /waiting to see impact on others' health (2) , no time to get vaccinated (1) , indifference (1) , no desire for vaccination (2) , and still thinking about it (1) . Conclusion: In a small, diverse sample of young adults with T1D, COVID-vaccinations mirrored national rates. Some participants may have been vaccinated after completing surveys at baseline. Patterns of high A1c and unvaccinated status may place young adults at increased risk as the pandemic continues. Healthcare providers are well positioned to counsel young adults about vaccine information and considerations related to T1D, which may reduce misinformation and increase uptake.

6.
Pract Lab Med ; 28: e00261, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1655023

ABSTRACT

To gain insights on the heterogeneity of immune responses to vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 and to identify factors that could make individuals vulnerable to infection due to lack of response to vaccination, our hospital started offering free voluntary post-antibody testing against the spike protein IgG for all fully vaccinated employees. Post-vaccination response against SARS-CoV-2 was assessed using the FDA-EUA approved VITROS anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG immunometric assay specific to the spike protein. Out of a total of 3266 antibody tests performed in fully vaccinated Texas Children's, 99.4% had a positive antibody response to the spike protein. From the 21 employees (0.6%) that had a negative response, 66.7% reported taking immunosuppressive drugs and/or biologics. Our data shows that most of the employees tested at our institution mounted an immune response to the immunogen in the vaccine. Post-vaccination antibody testing against SARS-CoV-2 can provide useful information to guide decisions about future vaccine doses.

7.
Open forum infectious diseases ; 8(Suppl 1):S376-S376, 2021.
Article in English | EuropePMC | ID: covidwho-1564283

ABSTRACT

Background Published data on COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) use in children and obstetric patients is limited. We describe a single-center experience of hospitalized patients who received CCP for acute COVID-19. Methods We performed a retrospective review of children 0-18-years-old and pregnant patients hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed acute COVID-19 who received CCP from March 1st, 2020 to March 1st, 2021. Clinical and laboratory data were collected to assess the safety of CCP administration. Antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 were measured before and at various timepoints post CCP transfusion. Correlation between SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin administered versus the SARS-CoV-2 anti-Spike immunoglobulin response in patient serum was assessed. Results Twenty-two children and 10 obstetric patients were eligible. 12 pediatric and 8 obstetric patients had moderate disease and 10 pediatric and 2 obstetric patients had severe disease. 5 pediatric patients died. 18/37 (48.6%) CCP units that were measured met FDA criteria for a high IgG titer. There were no complications with transfusion based on CDC, NHSN Biovigilance Component: Hemovigilance Module Surveillance Protocol. Two pediatric patients had fevers a few hours after CCP with low suspicion for a transfusion reaction. Median SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike antibody levels of pediatric patients post-transfusion for 0-7 days was 80.6AU/mL (range: 2-1070), 8-21 days was 180AU/mL (range: 12-661) and >21 days was 210AU/mL (range: 4.1-1220). For obstetric patients, post-transfusion antibody levels were only obtained 0-7 days post-transfusion with median 45AU/mL (range: 9.5-100). High-titer CCP showed a positive correlation with rise in patient immunoglobulin levels only in the obstetric patients but not in pediatric patients. Conclusion CCP was administered safely to our moderately to severely ill pediatric and obstetric patients. Among pediatric patients, the median serum antibody level increased over time after transfusion and suggested that CCP did not interfere with the endogenous antibody production. Antibody dose of high-titer CCP correlated with post-transfusion response in only obstetric patients. Randomized trials in pediatric and obstetric patients are needed to further understand how to dose CCP and evaluate efficacy. Disclosures Jun Teruya, MD, PhD, Apelo Consulting Pvt. Ltd (Consultant)Hemosonics (Other Financial or Material Support, Honorarium) Flor M. Munoz, MD, Biocryst (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Gilead (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Meissa (Other Financial or Material Support, DSMB)Moderna (Scientific Research Study Investigator, Other Financial or Material Support, DSMB)Pfizer (Scientific Research Study Investigator, Other Financial or Material Support, DSMB)Virometix (Other Financial or Material Support, DSMB)

8.
J Heart Lung Transplant ; 41(2): 133-136, 2022 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1509806

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data regarding the antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in children after solid organ transplant. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the SARS-CoV-2 Anti-Spike IgG antibodies measured following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination at our pediatric heart transplant (HTx) center. RESULTS: Among patients (median age 17.1 years) in whom antibody testing was performed (median 118 days post-vaccine completion), a SARS-CoV-2 Anti-Spike IgG antibody was detected in 28 of 40 (70%) post-HTx recipients (median antibody level 10.9 AU/ml). Neutropenia, diabetes mellitus, and previous use of rituximab were associated with absence of a detectable antibody. All 7 post-HTx patients with a known pre-vaccination SARS-CoV-2 viral infection had a detectable SARS-CoV-2 Anti-Spike IgG. All 12 vaccinated pre-HTx patients had a detectable antibody (median antibody level 11.6 AU/ml) including 5 patients that maintained detectable antibodies post-HTx. There were no cases of myocarditis among the total of 17 pre-HTx and 81 post-HTx patients that underwent SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that a significant proportion of pediatric HTx recipients have no detectable antibody response after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and support the recommendation to complete the vaccination series prior to HTx in those pediatric patients waiting for HTx.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19/prevention & control , Heart Transplantation , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/immunology , Adolescent , Age Factors , Antibody Formation , COVID-19/blood , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
9.
Clin Biochem ; 98: 70-73, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1433071

ABSTRACT

Serological tests for SARS-CoV-2 are a critical component of disease control strategies. SARS-CoV-2 serology tests used in clinical diagnostic should not accurately evaluate total levels the antibodies but also closely correlate with neutralizing antibodies titers. However, only limited data is available reporting correlation of neutralization antibody assays with commercial high-throughput serological assays widely used in clinical laboratories. We performed evaluation of the GenScript cPass neutralizing antibody detection assay, to assess its value for routine clinical use to measure neutralizing titers in patients who recovered from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) or have been vaccinated. We tested its clinical performance against the commonly used Ortho Vitros IgG assay. Our combined data shows that GenScript cPass neutralizing antibody assay has satisfactory analytical and clinical performance and good correlation with Ortho Vitros IgG, supporting its use as a tool for accurate SARS-COV-2 immune surveillance of recovered or vaccinated individuals.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Neutralizing/metabolism , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/metabolism , Humans
10.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 10(12)2020 Nov 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-945730

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients with hematological malignancies (HM), including multiple myeloma (MM), frequently suffer from immune deficiency-associated infectious complications because of both the disease and the treatment. Alarming results from China and the UK confirm the vulnerability of HM patients to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection-driven coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Given that the immunoassay interference from the endogenous monoclonal immunoglobulin (M paraprotein) and treatment antibodies continually challenges the MM management, it is critical to evaluate the SARS-CoV-2 serology tests for suspected interference/cross-reactivity. METHODS: We compared the degree of interference in three SARS-CoV-2 serology assay platforms in HM patients with and without COVID-19 and on various therapeutic monoclonal antibody (t-mAb) treatments. Further, we confirmed the cross-reactivity in pooled samples from normal and COVID-19 + samples spiked with respective antibodies in vitro. RESULTS: None of the 93 HM patient samples with or without t-MAbs showed cross-reactivity on any of the three serology platforms tested. CONCLUSIONS: The tested three serologic assays for SARS-CoV-2 are specific and do not have cross-reactivity with M-components or t-MAbs indicating that they can be used safely in oncology practice and in research exploring the immunologic response to COVID-19 in patients with HM.

12.
Clin Chim Acta ; 510: 790-795, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-778568

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: While the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection is primarily based on detection of viral RNA, the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies is useful for assessing past prevalence of the disease, and in corroborating a current infection in challenging cases. Sensitive and specific immunoassays provide the ability to identify exposure to SARS-CoV-2, to determine seroconversion, to confirm eligibility for donation of convalescent plasma as well as play an essential part in epidemiological studies. We report on the validation of the Ansh Laboratories SARS-CoV-2 IgG and SARS-CoV-2 IgM ELISA immunoassays. These assays were evaluated for detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM antibodies for clinical use in our hospital as part of an orthogonal testing algorithm recommended by the CDC. METHODS: Diagnostic specificity and sensitivity of the IgG and IgM ELISA assays were tested using samples confirmed to be negative or positive for COVID-19 by RT-PCR. We also evaluated precision, analytical interference, and cross-reactivity with known cases of infection with other viruses. Additionally, we validated concordance with molecular and other serological testing and evaluated seroconversion in our patient population. RESULTS: The IgG and IgM ELISA assays showed acceptable precision, were robust to analytical interference and did not exhibit cross reactivity with specimens positive for common respiratory viruses. Both assays exhibited 95% agreement with a primary screening serological assay utilized at our institution as well as with a reference laboratory semi-quantitative method. Concordance with RT-PCR was excellent > 6 days after symptom onset (100%). CONCLUSIONS: The Ansh SARS-CoV-2 ELISA assays have good analytical performance suitable for clinical use.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus/immunology , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Immunoglobulin G/analysis , Immunoglobulin M/analysis , Epitopes/immunology , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/immunology , Immunoglobulin M/immunology , SARS-CoV-2
13.
Am J Clin Pathol ; 154(6): 742-747, 2020 11 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-735674

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of serostatus against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has emerged as an important tool in identification of exposure to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We report on the validation of the Vitros Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Total (CoV2T) assay for qualitative serologic testing of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. METHODS: We performed validation studies according to Commission of Office Laboratories Accreditation guidelines, using samples previously tested for SARS-CoV-2 by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). We evaluated precision, analytical interferences, and cross-reactivity with other viral infections; evaluated concordance with molecular and other serologic testing; and evaluated seroconversion. RESULTS: The Vitros CoV2T assay exhibited acceptable precision and did not exhibit cross-reactivity with other acute respiratory virus infections. The CoV2T assay exhibited 100% negative predictive agreement (56/56) and 71% positive predictive agreement (56/79) with RT-PCR across all patient samples and was concordant with other serologic assays. Concordance with RT-PCR was 97% more than 7 days after symptom onset. The CoV2T assay was robust to icterus and lipemia but had interference from significant hemolysis. CONCLUSIONS: The Vitros CoV2T assay was successfully validated in our laboratory. We anticipate it will be a useful tool in screening for exposure to SARS-CoV-2; however, the use of the CoV2T and other serologic assays in the clinical management of patients with COVID-19 is unknown and must be evaluated in future studies.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/methods , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , COVID-19 Testing , Humans , Immunoassay/methods , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Sensitivity and Specificity , Serologic Tests
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL